What information architect salaries are, and how do people choose them? We’ve got to ask ourselves who we want to work for if we want to become a better engineer, a more effective leader, or a more effective entrepreneur.
I’ve heard people use the phrase “information architect” and “information architect” quite a bit now, but the difference isn’t as clear as many people seem to think. Its a difference between an engineer who builds something that is of value to society, has purpose, and is of a high quality, vs. an engineer who is going to build something of value for the company but will never think for himself.
For the most part we will be building something of value to society. A lot of our value is based on the fact that you can build something that will help the environment, save a life, or teach a lesson that will be useful to many others. And for an engineer, that is of a high quality. It takes a lot of time, a lot of research, and a great deal of creativity to come up with something that can be of value to society.
I imagine it would be cool to be an engineer. I can’t say that I’ve ever reached the stage of being able to explain my work at another company to a friend. But I do know that it takes a lot of time and thought. The typical engineer is a person who is self-driven and has a passion for their field. The typical engineer is also a person who has to think very hard and very long about what they are making.
I could imagine a good engineer having a lot of time on their hands. But while an engineer may have plenty of time to put into their work, I can guarantee that they won’t have a lot of spare time to think about the world around them. This is one reason why a good programmer may be better at software engineering than a good engineer.
It’s not just being a good programmer that matters. It’s also being a good information architect, someone who can see the big picture and make changes that may change the world. While I don’t think anyone’s actually made that transition, there are plenty of people who are in that position.
The idea that information architects are good programmers is the one that gets most of people confused. I have a friend who is an information architect, and he is good at it. I also have a friend (who is a good programmer) who is an information architect, and he is bad at it. Both of us are good at our jobs, and both of us are good at being an information architect.
If you actually do a good job and get paid well for doing that, it’s very likely that you’ll end up being a good information architect. If you end up a bad job and being forced to work for a company that doesn’t want you, you might end up being an information architect.
Information architects mostly work as consultants, but do some work as part of their day job. They often have to work in very different environments, and it’s a good job to have if you’re good at what you do. If you’re having trouble figuring out how to fill out your resume if you have no experience, ask your friend what he does. He might be able to help you pick the right job.
Information architects are paid by the project. Some get paid by the day, others by the hour, some by the project. The best way to figure out how well an information architect will perform is to ask him, and if he seems like an easy person to talk to, its a good sign. If youre really anxious about it you can always email him or call him.